Have We Completely Misunderstood Nietzsche's Most Radical Ideas?
Friedrich Nietzsche remains one of history's most electrifying and polarizing thinkers. His intellectual life was a storm of brilliant, painful insights that ultimately cost him his sanity. Yet, his ideas—most famously the "death of God" and the "superhuman"—are woven into the fabric of modern culture. But in their popularity, are they truly understood?
Nietzsche’s work is notoriously difficult to pin down. He suffered from debilitating headaches from a young age, preventing him from concentrating for long periods. This physical reality shaped his philosophical style; rather than building systematic arguments like Kant or Hegel, he wrote in sharp, aphoristic bursts. His philosophy became an art form, where truth is captured not in a lengthy proof, but in a vivid, metaphorical flash. This style, however, has made him vulnerable to misinterpretation. His own sister infamously twisted his unpublished notes into the book The Will to Power, rebranding the philosopher as a proto-fascist ideologue. The truth, however, is far more complex and stands in stark opposition to such ideologies.
The Primal Struggle: Apollo and Dionysus
In his first and only conventionally structured book, The Birth of Tragedy from the Spirit of Music, Nietzsche overturned the established view of ancient Greece. Before him, antiquity was seen as the serene childhood of civilization, a time of perfect harmony. Nietzsche sensed something different lurking beneath the surface: a deep, chaotic force.
He illustrated this tension through two Greek gods, who represent two fundamental principles of existence:
- The Apollonian: Named for Apollo, the god of light, dreams, and clear forms. This is the principle of order, harmony, and individuality. It is the beauty we see in sculpture and architecture, a rational force that gives shape to the world. We contemplate Apollonian art from a distance, appreciating its beautiful, defined forms.
- The Dionysian: Named for Dionysus, the wild god of wine, intoxication, and ecstasy. This is the principle of chaos, primordial unity, and explosive creation. It is the raw, uncontrollable energy we feel in music and dance, where individuality dissolves into a collective, sensual experience.
For Nietzsche, culture requires both. Man cannot withstand the pure, unbridled energy of the Dionysian; it would be overwhelming. He needs the structure and clarity of the Apollonian to make sense of it. Nietzsche uses a powerful metaphor: we are like Odysseus, who had his crew tie him to the mast so he could hear the enchanting, deadly song of the Sirens. Culture, the Apollonian chains, allows us to experience the profound, chaotic truths of Dionysus without being destroyed.
The Proclamation That Changed Everything: "God is Dead"
When Nietzsche’s madman cries out in the marketplace, "God is dead," it is not a cheer of victory. It is a diagnosis. Nietzsche was observing the active secularization of Europe, recognizing that the Christian worldview, which had provided meaning, morality, and a clear place for humanity in the cosmos for centuries, was losing its power.
The death of God was not just about the loss of a deity; it was about the collapse of the entire framework of meaning. The "shadow of God"—the empty space at the center of the European worldview—remained. This void led to the nihilism and pessimism that would come to define so much of 20th-century thought, particularly existentialism. If the central pillar of our reality is removed, what happens to everything else?
Beyond Good and Evil: A New Morality
For Nietzsche, the next domino to fall was classical morality. He argued that concepts like "good" and "evil" are not universal truths but human conventions—customs we have adopted. With the decline of the Christian worldview that upheld them, we can no longer honestly believe in Christian morality. To reject God but cling to his moral code is a contradiction.
So, what are good and evil? For Nietzsche, they are born from a choice of values. He identified two fundamental types of morality:
- Master Morality: This is the morality of the ancient aristocrats, the strong and noble individuals who have the power to create their own values. Their "good" is whatever affirms their strength, pride, and will.
- Slave Morality: This morality arises from the weak, who are unable to challenge the strong directly. Their response is born of ressentiment—a bitter, vengeful feeling stemming from impotence. Through ressentiment, the weak perform an ingenious trick: they re-brand their weakness as virtue. Meekness, humility, and pity become "good," while the strength and pride of the masters are reframed as "evil." According to Nietzsche, Christian morality ("turn the other cheek") is the ultimate expression of slave morality, a creative act born from the desire for revenge.
Nietzsche's call was for a return to the spirit of the aristocracy—not a social class, but a nobility of the soul. We must have the courage to create our own values and obey our own inner voice, not the will of an external authority.
The Successor to God: The Superhuman (Übermensch)
If God is dead, who or what will take his place? Nietzsche’s answer is the Übermensch, or superhuman. This concept, laid out in his prophetic book Thus Spoke Zarathustra, is not about a biological evolution but a spiritual one. The goal is the transformation of the human being, the task of overcoming oneself.
The superhuman is the heir to God. With the divine gone, we can no longer rely on an external power for purpose or salvation. We must become our own support. The superhuman embodies this new reality:
- Instead of divine mercy, he has the will to power—understood not as domination over others, but as the drive for self-mastery and creation.
- Instead of eternal life in heaven, he embraces the eternal return—the idea of living one's life in such a way that you would be willing to repeat it infinitely, with all its joy and pain.
The superhuman is a joyful being, but this joy is earned through hardship and self-overcoming. This is where the fascist interpretation fails so profoundly. They saw the superhuman as a ruthless conqueror. For Nietzsche, the superhuman is an artist, a philosopher, a creator. His power is in creating new values, not in destroying people. Fascism demands subordination to the state, the complete opposite of Nietzsche's ideal of the free-spirited individual who obeys only his own will. Where fascism builds a society of obedience, Nietzsche envisions a world of sovereign individuals.
Nietzsche's philosophy remains a challenge. It is a defiant call to reject easy answers and take on the terrifying responsibility of creating meaning for ourselves in a world that offers none.
References
-
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future. (1886).
This work is a direct exploration of the themes discussed. Nietzsche dissects the history of morality, laying out his theory of master and slave moralities in detail. Specifically, Part Five, "Natural History of Morals," and Part Nine, "What Is Noble?" (Aphorisms 257-296) provide a foundational understanding of his critique of traditional values and his vision for a new kind of philosopher and noble human being.
-
Kaufmann, Walter. Nietzsche: Philosopher, Psychologist, Antichrist. (1950). Princeton University Press.
This is the seminal scholarly work that was instrumental in rescuing Nietzsche's reputation from the Nazi misappropriation. Kaufmann carefully dismantles the misreadings and presents a nuanced interpretation of Nietzsche's core concepts, including the will to power, the superhuman, and the eternal return. He argues compellingly that Nietzsche's philosophy is one of self-discipline and creativity, fundamentally at odds with the conformity and brutality of totalitarianism. Chapters 11 ("The Master Race") and 12 ("The Übermensch") are particularly relevant for correcting the political misinterpretations of his work.