Why We Rush to Call Our Friends 'Toxic'

Blog | Relationship

We get swept up in flashbacks sometimes. Thoughts of old friendships, some that ended poorly, leaving a bitter taste. The word "toxic" gets thrown around so easily now. It’s a convenient label for a friend who hurt us, and the common advice is simple: run before your self-esteem is eroded. But is every uncomfortable interaction, every disagreement, truly toxic? Or is it possible that sometimes, the issue isn't them, but our own perspective? A comfortable friendship should be a source of strength, but what does that actually look like?

Let's be serious for a moment. Is a friend toxic if they openly criticize your partner? Or if they say a green hoodie looks better on you than a black one? What if they just can't bear to listen to your lecture about the world's injustices for the tenth time this month? These situations are rarely black and white. Before we label someone, we need to consider a fundamental rule: a person who is irritable or rude in a moment isn't necessarily a toxic person by nature. If a friend seems unwilling to dive into your feelings, it might not be a character flaw. Perhaps they simply don't have the emotional capacity to act as your therapist right now.

The Accidental Villain: Misinterpreting the Signs

Think about it: are you seeking support or just dumping your emotions? This dynamic can become draining. Consider the characters Maddy and Cassie from the series Euphoria, where one friend constantly unloads her problems onto the other. This kind of one-sided venting can be counterproductive. Some studies even suggest that endlessly talking about our anger doesn't help us move past it, but instead fuels it, leading to a potential loss of control down the line. Perhaps your friend is just exhausted by the negativity. Maybe their way of coping with stress is to tear up paper or go for a run, not to dissect every feeling. Their discomfort might lead them to interrupt you or change the subject, landing them in your "toxic" folder when all they did was choose their own comfort in that moment.

And we can't forget the fundamental attribution error. This is a psychological tendency where we attribute other people’s actions to their character, while attributing our own actions to external circumstances. Imagine you and a friend plan to meet up, a meeting you've anticipated all week. Then, the day comes, and you get a text: "Sorry, can't make it." The attribution error immediately whispers that your friend doesn't value you, that a "good person" wouldn't do this. Of course, if this becomes a pattern, it’s a legitimate problem. But if it’s a one-time event, it's far more likely to be about their circumstances. You can't see how brutal their week was or how emotionally spent they are. You only see your own canceled plans and hurt feelings. As a result, another potentially good friend gets mislabeled.

Our own emotional state is the final, volatile ingredient. When we are hungry, overjoyed, or exhausted, our reactions to the exact same comment can vary wildly. One day we see a friend as a harsh critic, the next a kind advisor, and on a bad day, the main villain. Often, all that's needed to clear the air is to simply ask, "What did you mean by that?" It's highly unlikely that a person who genuinely cares for you wants to deliberately hurt or insult you.

True Red Flags: Devaluation and Manipulation

However, sometimes people really do offer unsolicited criticism, and it is entirely within your power to set a boundary and stop it. And sometimes, the issues run deeper than simple misunderstandings. There are genuine alarm bells in a friendship that should not be ignored.

One of the most critical tasks of friendship is social support. Our friends are our mirror; they help us confirm that we’re okay, that we fit in, that we aren't outcasts. If a friend consistently makes you doubt yourself and your worth, that is a serious red flag. We all need to feel a sense of self-efficacy—the belief that our actions matter and produce positive results. While internal motivation is powerful, external motivation in the form of praise and recognition from those we care about is a fundamental human need. A friend who constantly devalues your achievements is undermining a core pillar of your well-being.

Then there is manipulation. Think of the dynamic between Malfoy and his cronies, Crabbe and Goyle. He used them for his own ends, with no regard for their feelings beyond what was written in fan fiction. This type of friendship exists in the real world, where the goal might be anything from coercing you into social activities you dislike to outright exploitation. Sure, some people might enjoy having a friend who plans every detail of a trip, but if you consistently find yourself being led where you don't want to go, it's a reason to pause and reflect on the balance of power in the relationship.

The Architecture of a Strong Bond

So, if we move past the simplistic labels, what does a healthy friendship actually look like? There’s no universal formula, but the bedrock is comfort and safety. Being a good friend is a skill, one that we have to learn, just as we once learned to hold a fork or to read.

Friends fulfill our deep-seated needs for attachment and security. They support us not just emotionally, but also physically or materially. A true friend is someone you can call to help assemble an IKEA wardrobe and then stay to gossip with for an hour. This capacity for empathy and compassion is rooted in our biology through mirror neurons. This support network has a measurable impact on our happiness. Researchers have noted that in cultures with high degrees of individualism, people often report lower levels of happiness than in more collectivist societies. Friendship acts as a powerful buffer, especially in the face of shared struggles like economic hardship. Who better to complain to about rising prices than a friend who is right there with you?

A good friend will listen, but learning to truly listen is a skill. It requires not just paying attention, but showing your involvement. Yes, for the sake of friendship, you might have to learn the names of all the members of BTS. And another crucial skill is the "I-statement." When conflicts arise, they should be navigated by talking about yourself, not by attacking the other person. For instance, instead of saying, "You're a terrible friend," try, "I feel hurt by what happened." This way, you are not leveling an accusation but are openly sharing your emotions, making the situation transparent and easier to resolve.

Many relationships are damaged by the cognitive distortion that our feelings should be obvious to others. We project our own thoughts and invent theories about what’s going on in their head, but this kind of mind-reading is almost always wrong. If you are debating whether to say something, it is usually better to say it.

The Art of Saying 'Not Today'

This brings us to boundaries. Yes, even with your closest friends. Your friendship may have been forged in fire and late-night tears, but you must still remember that every person is ultimately responsible for their own well-being. Personal boundaries are not unbreachable walls; the healthiest boundaries are flexible. It’s okay to give in sometimes and essential to stand your ground at other times. Avoid black-and-white thinking. In friendship, as in life, the truth is usually somewhere in the middle. If one day you’re relaxing while your friend buys you pizza, be prepared on another day to listen to them rant about a character they hate in a show you love.

There are no clear-cut rules for friendship; any "best friend code" we had is long outdated. The only universal guidelines are your own comfort and the safety of the connection. And if the outside world thinks your inside jokes with a friend are strange or "toxic," it doesn't matter. If you both are happy being called a rat, then what does anyone else's opinion matter? What’s important is building relationships that feel right and comfortable to you.

References

  • Myers, D. G. (2010). Social Psychology (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
    This foundational textbook provides a comprehensive overview of key concepts in social psychology. For the topics discussed, Chapter 4, "Behavior and Attitudes," and Chapter 12, "Helping," are particularly relevant. It explains the fundamental attribution error in detail, clarifying how we tend to misjudge the motivations of others by attributing their actions to their personality rather than their situation. It also explores the mechanisms of social support and its profound impact on well-being.
  • Gordon, T. (2000). Parent Effectiveness Training: The Proven Program for Raising Responsible Children. Three Rivers Press.
    Although the title focuses on parenting, this book is the primary source for the widely adopted communication technique known as the "I-statement" (or "I-message"). On pages 135-146, Gordon explains how to formulate these statements to express feelings and needs without blaming or attacking the other person. This method is universally applicable to any interpersonal relationship, including friendships, for resolving conflict constructively.
  • Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Very Happy People. Psychological Science, 13(1), 81–84.
    This classic study directly investigates the lifestyles of the happiest individuals. The researchers found that strong social relationships were a necessary ingredient for high levels of happiness. The findings strongly support the article's assertion that friendship and social support are not just pleasant additions to life but are essential for deep, sustained well-being, concluding that "every very happy person... had rich and satisfying social relationships."